Sound quality difference between the CDJ-2000NSX2 vs CDJ-900NXS?

[Evolved]

Sound quality difference between the CDJ-2000NSX2 vs CDJ-900NXS?
Using the example a new WAV file from Beatport does either player produce a more accurate sound quality reproduction than the other?
(CDJ-2000NSX2 VS CDJ-900NXS)


Another separate question that may or may not pertain to the first:

The THD on the 2000NXS2 is < 0.018 % (JEITA)

The THD on the 900NXS is .< 0.003 % (JEITA)


Unless I am reading the THD percentage wrong - 0.003% would mean 0.003% or less distortion correct?

Thank you.

[Manu]

It stands for total harmonic distortion. And at less than 0.01% you won't notice it at all. In terms of sound quality, you would have to test side by side with the same music, and using decent quality files. Again you won't notice the difference. In terms of pure math, the human ear cannot detect a 0.015% difference.

Unless I am reading the THD percentage wrong - 0.003% would mean 0.003% or less distortion correct?

That is correct, and at this point it is pretty much insignificant... I wouldn't worry too much about that. What matters is that you use the highest quality tracks you can afford.

[Nicadraus]

You won't any difference if you're trying to listen from the same track at the same bit rate. Unless you are a dog, bat or dolphin.

[KLH]

No difference... especially if the source is MP3s.

[Dieseldefv]

Bud if youre playing MP£s through any nexus players youll never hear the difference. I have 2 2000nxs & there is nothing better, cant comment on 900nxs