Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Traktor Scratch A6 Vs. Serato SL1

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,122

    Traktor Scratch A6 Vs. Serato SL1

    I don't like these "vs" threads, but on this occasion I need to start one, lol.

    I currently have Serato - the original SL1. It works great, but 2 things that I don't like about it are lack of FLAC support and the more I use it, the more I find that it's not brilliant for scratching, particularly with slow record movements.

    If I switched to using a Traktor Scratch A6 then it would be a relatively cheap upgrade, as Serato SL1 packages still sell for £200 or thereabouts on eBay and the A6 package is £249 new (and maybe a little cheaper if I shop around). Traktor supports FLAC and I've heard that it's marginally better for scratching too - not sure if that's true or not.

    So there are 2 things that are holding me back: -

    1. Is Traktor better/worse/same for scratching?

    2. I only need a DVS as a basic vinyl replacement. All I want to do is be able to add my library to it, then I'd use it to mix/scratch as if I was using vinyl. I've read comments that say Traktor is too complicated, that the UI isn't very good for regular DJing, and that it's more designed for "controllerists" and people that use controllers to do on the fly production/mash ups and what have you. At the most I might use cue points or loops, but that'll be it.

    So with that in mind, would switching be a wise move or should I just stick with what I've got? Please bear in mind my particular needs, rather than just saying "I have Traktor and it's great!" or whatever.

    Cheers!

  2. #2
    Deez Beats! KLH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    7,013
    You may want to consider asking if SL2-4 makes a difference to as the SL-1 only uses USB1.1 (IIRC) where the others use USB2. With the increase in IO throughput there might be impact to scratching performance.

    Just a thought.

    -KLH
    -KLH
    Visit DJF's Beginner's MEGA thread and drop by my Facebook Fan Page.

  3. #3
    Member silentsounds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    D.C. Metro Area, USA
    Posts
    258
    I'd look into the SL2-4 as well if I were you. I found the Traktor interface too busy and a bit tedious to use. I've seen a couple of reviews comparing the latest Serato versions with those of Traktor's and there generally doesn't seem to be huge differences from what I can recall in terms of scratching performance.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,122
    Cheers doods. The SL2 is £100 more than the A6 and the SL4 is nearly 3 times the price. I don't really want to pay that much.

    Why don't Native Instruments sort the Traktor interface out? Nearly every gripe I see about it is related to that.

  5. #5
    Member silentsounds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    D.C. Metro Area, USA
    Posts
    258
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
    Cheers doods. The SL2 is £100 more than the A6 and the SL4 is nearly 3 times the price. I don't really want to pay that much.

    Why don't Native Instruments sort the Traktor interface out? Nearly every gripe I see about it is related to that.
    If you spend some time with it, you will figure it out. However, it's not as straight forward as Serato is.

    Note: I'm talking about Traktor Pro 2 since it's the version I own.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    215
    I can see how Traktor could look confusing or cluttered, but one good thing is that you can really simplify the look by getting rid of most of the stuff you dont want to see or use. Serato obviously has the overlaping waveforms which are a nice aid for quickly beatmatching. Traktor does have a phase meter, but it's really useless unless you have good beatgrids which doesnt seem like you would want to get into.

    Sounds like you would be beatmatching exclusively by ear anyways so you can always give Traktor a try for free. Download a demo of Traktor pro 2 from the NI website and play with these tabs found in the preferences section: browser details/global settings/mixer/decks layout . These tabs all have layout options in them where you can get rid of or include something to your liking or even change the look of some stuff.
    Last edited by B3NNY; 04-07-2012 at 06:15 AM.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,254
    1. Traktor is supposed to be better at tracking small/slow movements of the CV.

    2. The UI is pretty customizable. You'll never have the waveforms scrolling together, but...whatever. If you want, you can put it into browser only mode and get everything out of the way except your library.

  8. #8
    Here is Dj Qbert's comparison

    Click here for mobile viewing.
    Music not only changes our mood, but it also changes the way we think and our perception of the world.

  9. #9
    Member DJNR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    2,646
    Personally, I think the UI is fine in Traktor, but granted I have been using it for four years. When I first started, I didn't really have troubles picking it up. Anyways, to answer your question, either software will work. I would just look for the best deal on either and roll with it.
    Equipment: CDJ 2000 Nexus, DJM 900 Nexus, Ultrasone DJ1 Pro, AiAiAi TMA-1 Fool's Gold Edition.

  10. #10
    Moderator pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    old orléans
    Posts
    1,545
    You know Torq eliminated sticker drift and has flac.
    Also has a simple interface.
    Also can use your Serato soundcard.

    Plus you love Torq so much already, its a no brainer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
a