Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59

Thread: Beatport pricing

  1. #41
    Member Era 7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kassel / Inside your speaker
    Posts
    1,613
    indeed.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blackest View Post
    Its all good Sween. I will say that I am disappointed that its not malt liquor. Just imagine sippin on a 40 w/ Obama's face on it. That would be hot. You'd be fuckin white girls in no time!

  2. #42
    Wtf. I'm going to have to go with Sigma on this. And, don't be pompous and spout off about anyone who cannot buy a $2 track should stop DJ'ing and go flip hamburgers. Most people don't want to pick up 40 songs off of Beatport and pay $130 for it (including lossless upgrade). I'm not going to have a collection of digital music at 320kbps when for a dollar more I can have a lossless format that doesn't cost Beatport or any other distributor any more money besides hard drive space and bandwidth which I can sure as hell bet does not equate to an extra $1 per track in operating expenses.
    It is what a man thinks of himself that really determines his fate. -Thoreau
    The Derivative of Sound Episode #5 - Soundcloud (New as of 3-4-13)

  3. #43
    Member login's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mexico City
    Posts
    570
    mp3 doesn't retain value because they can be copied.

    But while in the store they have value and even a lot of people would pay for full collections (even if its illegal)

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by M!TCH View Post
    Wtf. I'm going to have to go with Sigma on this. And, don't be pompous and spout off about anyone who cannot buy a $2 track should stop DJ'ing and go flip hamburgers. Most people don't want to pick up 40 songs off of Beatport and pay $130 for it (including lossless upgrade). I'm not going to have a collection of digital music at 320kbps when for a dollar more I can have a lossless format that doesn't cost Beatport or any other distributor any more money besides hard drive space and bandwidth which I can sure as hell bet does not equate to an extra $1 per track in operating expenses.
    Stop crying about the cost of lossless. 40 tracks used to cost you $400 dollars AT LEAST. Some of you guys sound like whiny bitches.

  5. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Akl. NZ
    Posts
    187
    Well someones an angry beaver today.

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by tekno_violet View Post
    Well someones an angry beaver today.
    Helpful contribution as usual.

  7. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Akl. NZ
    Posts
    187
    My helpful contribution was made somewhere on page 1 before you came in with your chest pounding, pissing contest crap.

  8. #48
    Member Era 7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kassel / Inside your speaker
    Posts
    1,613
    Quote Originally Posted by mrkleen View Post
    Helpful contribution as usual.
    Quote Originally Posted by mrkleen View Post
    If people cant afford $2 dollars for a track....they need to get out of DJing and go flip burgers. That is just pathetic.
    just as helpful as you i guess.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blackest View Post
    Its all good Sween. I will say that I am disappointed that its not malt liquor. Just imagine sippin on a 40 w/ Obama's face on it. That would be hot. You'd be fuckin white girls in no time!

  9. #49
    Junodownload sells em for cheaper. Some tunes that were $2.49 a pop on Beatport were going for $1.89 on Juno. I will say that lately I've been getting mp3s directly from the label's online store.


    Thats just me though....

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Era 7 View Post
    just as helpful as you i guess.
    WTF you guys are waiting for? The prices on Lossless to go down? Vinyl to make this big comeback?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •