The rep levels are way too charitable, set such with the site relaunch. Let's knock it waay back. I got 1995 rep and been had full stars. Should I have so many? No way. Same for the rest of you suckas.
Printable View
The rep levels are way too charitable, set such with the site relaunch. Let's knock it waay back. I got 1995 rep and been had full stars. Should I have so many? No way. Same for the rest of you suckas.
negged
:P
Yeah, I'll second motion that :hump:
It's not a bad idea actually. Maybe even make the action annual.
First, more discussion needed.
What are rep levels, and why do they matter? :)
They used to not matter, but now they are a part requirement to submit a mix. No rep, can't post. It's a spam prevention measure, so regular members don't have their mixes buried under a ton of crap.
I agree with Hygro.
If I am an active member in this forum and can positively contribute in some way to the community - then should I be viewed as someone with less worthiness than someone with full reps??
Anybody who has consistently spent hours on this forum can get a sense of which members are genuinely interested in improving their craft or helping new members with advice. I see many members who are from the post Mayan calendar with many rep points but have not contributed here for a long time (years).
I am an old guy so I no longer seek, nor require validation from my peers. I am also indifferent whether I have full reps or not.
yet perhaps the pre-mayan? people gained their rep by contributing the technical threads that people still browse the internet to find. I myself ended-up here because I was looking for advice on how to set-up audacity properly, so the technical threads are worth more than the 'I agree dude' ones, i.m.oQuote:
Originally Posted by BDC
Poll thread here:
http://www.djforums.com/forums/showt...-for-2019-Poll